Physical and sensorial quality of arabica coffee cultivars submitted to two types of post-harvesting processing

Authors

  • Ricardo Dias Alixandre Universidade Federal do Espirito Santo/UFES, Programa de Pós-graduação em Agronomia, Campus Alegre, Alegre, ES, Brasil. https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1856-6179
  • Fabiano Tristão Alixandre Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo/UFES, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Genética e Melhoramento, Campus Alegre, Alegre, ES, Brasil. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8222-4803
  • Paula Aparecida Muniz de Lima Universidade Federal do Espirito Santo/UFES, Programa de Pós-graduação em Agronomia, Campus Alegre, Alegre, ES, Brasil. https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1601-1786
  • Maurício José Fornazier Instituto Capixaba de Pesquisa, Assistência Técnica e Extensão Rural/INCAPER, Venda Nova do Imigrante, ES, Brasil. https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8403-6390
  • Cesar Abel Krohling Instituto Capixaba de Pesquisa, Assistência Técnica e Extensão Rural/INCAPER, Marechal Floriano, ES, Brasil. https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7633-8612
  • José Francisco Teixeira do Amaral Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo/UFES, Departamento de Agronomia, Alegre, ES, Brasil. https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3027-4830
  • Rogério Carvalho Guarçoni Instituto Capixaba de Pesquisa, Assistência Técnica e Extensão Rural/INCAPER, Venda Nova do Imigrante, ES, Brasil. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6095-2287
  • Rodrigo da Silva Dias Inove Consultoria, Venda Nova do Imigrante, ES, Brasil. https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0356-1316
  • Cassio de Faria Venturini Instituto Federal de Educação, Ciência e Tecnologia do Espírito Santo/IFES, Santa Teresa, ES, Brasil. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7331-3724
  • Higor Alixandre Macette Universidade Federal do Espirito Santo/UFES, Programa de Pós-graduação em Agronomia, Campus Alegre, Alegre, ES, Brasil. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4626-3450
  • Cecília Uliana Zandonadi Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa e Inovação do Espírito Santo, Venda Nova do Imigrante, ES, Brasil. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0441-4505
  • David Brunelli Viçosi Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa e Inovação do Espírito Santo, Venda Nova do Imigrante, ES, Brasil. https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8279-4673

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25186/.v18i.2081

Abstract

The growing demand for better quality coffees has driven changes in the coffee production chain, mainly through the adoption of new technologies and management. Thus, this work was carried out aiming to evaluate the physical and sensorial quality of Arabica coffee cultivars, submitted to natural and pulped post-harvesting processing. The experiment was carried out following a randomized block design with three replications, in a split-plot scheme, with the plots consisting of five cultivars (Catucaí 2 SL, Catucaí 24/137, Catuaí IAC 44, Arara and Acauã); and the subplots by two processes, pulped and natural cherry. The harvest was carried out manually, harvesting the cherry fruits (ripe) in a sieve. The coffees were processed by the natural and pulped cherry methods. Drying was carried out on a covered suspended terrace, until the grains reached 11% ± 1 moisture (wet basis, bu). The following evaluations were carried out: sensorial analysis of the beverage according to the SCAA methodology, analysis of grain sieves according to the Official Brazilian
Coffee Classification Protocol. The results show that all evaluated cultivars have a great potential for the production of specialty coffees in that studied environment. Differences were observed between cultivars both in the sensory quality of the beverage and in the grain size. Cultivar Arara presents a general average of final beverage grade higher than the other cultivars.

Key-words: Arabica coffee; Coffee sieve size; natural processing; pulped cherries; specialty coffee.

References

ALVES, G. E. et al. Physiological and sensorial quality of Arabica coffee subjected to different temperatures and drying airflows. Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy, 39(2):225-233, 2017.

AMEYU, M. A. Influence of harvesting and postharvest processing methods on the quality of Arabica coffee (Coffea arabica L.) in Eastern Ethiopia. ISABB Journal of Food and Agricultural Sciences, 7(1):1-9, 2017.

BARBOSA, I. P. et al. A. Sensory quality of Coffea arabica L. genotypes influenced by postharvest processing. Crop Breeding and Applied Biotechnology, 19(4):428-435, 2019.

BORÉM, F. et al. Coffee sensory quality study based on spatial distribution in the Mantiqueira Mountain Region of Brazil. Journal of Sensory Studies, 35(2):e12552, 2020.

BRASIL, Ministério da Agricultura, Pecuária e Abastecimento. Instrução Normativa n° 8, de 11 de jun. 2003, Regulamento técnico de

identidade e de qualidade para a classificação do café beneficiado grão cru. 2003. 13p.

CARDOSO, D. A. et al. Seleção de progênies F4 oriundas do cruzamento Icatu e Catuaí amarelo com resistência à

ferrugem. Coffee Science, 11(4):555-566, 2016.

CARVALHO, A. M. et al. Selection of coffee progenies of catucaí group. Coffee Science, 11(2):244–254, 2016.

CHALFOUN, S. M. et al. Sensorial characteristics of coffee (Coffea arabica L.) varieties in the Alto Paranaíba region.

Coffee Science, 8(1):43-52, 2013.

CLAY, D. C. et al. Farmer incentives and value chain governance: critical elements to sustainable growth in Rwanda’s coffee sector. Journal of Rural Studies, 63:200-2130, 2018.

COMPANHIA NACIONAL DE ABASTECIMENTO - CONAB. Acompanhamento da safra brasileira de café, Brasília, DF, v.9 safra 2022, n. 1, primeiro levantamento janeiro 2022. Available in: <http://www.conab.gov.br>. Access in: March 16, 2023.

FERNANDES, M. I. S. et al. Coffee cultivars productive and quality parameters in the Alto Paranaiba region, Minas

Gerais, Brazil. Research, Society and Development, 9(9):e147996681, 2020.

FERREIRA, A. D. et al. Desempenho agronômico de seleções de café bourbon vermelho e bourbon amarelo de

diferentes origens. Pesquisa agropecuária brasileira, 48(4):388-394, 2013.

FERREIRA, A. D. et al. Chemical and sensory characteristics in the selection of bourbon genotypes. Bioscience

Journal, 37:1981-3163, 2021.

FREITAS, M. N. et al. Identification of physiological analysis parameters associated with coffee beverage

quality. Ciência e Agrotecnologia, 44:e031019, 2020.

KROHLING, C. A. et al. Adaptation of progenies/cultivars of arabica coffee (coffea arabica l.) in mountainous

edafoclimatic conditions. Coffee Science, 13(2):198-209, 2018.

MATIELLO, J. B. et al. Colheita, processamento e qualidade, In: MATIELLO, J. B. (Ed). Cultura do café no Brasil.

Rio de Janeiro, RJ: MAPA/PROCAFÉ, p. 471-528, 2020.

NICOLELI, M. et al. Structural aspects of specialty coffee context on transaction costs view. Custos e agronegócio

online, 11(4):2-29, 2015.

OLIVEIRA, P. D. et al. Physiological aspects of coffee beans, processed and dried through different methods,

associated with sensory quality. Coffee Science, 8(2):211-220, 2013.

PEREIRA, T. B. et al. F4 coffee progenies selection obtained from icatu group cultivars. Coffee Science, 8(3):337-346, 2013.

PIMENTA, C. J. Qualidade do café. 2. ed. Lavras: Editora UFLA, 2020. 273p.

PINTO, M. F. et al. Selection of coffee progenties derived from Catuaí with Icatu and hibrido Timor. Coffee Science, 7(3):215-222, 2012.

R CORE TEAM. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Viena, Áustria: R foundation for

statistical computing. 2022. Available in: <https://www.Rproject. org>. Access in: March 27, 2023.

RIBEIRO, D. E. et al. Interaction of genotype, environment and processing in the chemical composition expression and sensorial quality of Arabica coffee. African Journal of Agricultural Research, 11(27):2412-2422, 2016.

RIBEIRO, B. B. et al. Profile coffee cultivars sensory processed in dry and humid via after storage. Coffee

Science, 12(2):148-155, 2017.

RIBEIRO, D. E. et al. Profile of organic acids and bioactive compounds in the sensory quality discrimination of arabica coffee. Coffee Science, 13(2):187-197, 2018.

RODRIGUES, W. N. et al. Severity of leaf rust and brown eyespot in genotypes of Coffea arabica L. cultivated with

high plant density. American Journal of Plant Sciences, 5(25):3702- 3709, 2014.

SOBREIRA, F. M. et al. Divergence among arabica coffee genotypes for sensory quality. Australian Journal of

Crop Science, 10(10):1442-1448, 2016.

SPECIALTY COFFEE ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA -SCAA. Protocols: Cupping specialty coffee. 2015.

Available in: <https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=2ah

UKEwi7xPuRteH9AhUNLbkGHQ_vDMsQFnoECA4QAQ&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.scaa.org%2FPDF%2

Fresources%2Fcupping-protocols.pdf&usg=AOvVaw00htBSVpoKOHTeEvbV2nJ7>. Access in: March 27, 2023.

TRIENEKENS, J. H. J. Agricultural value chains in developing countries: A framework for analysis. International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, 14(2):51-82, 2011.

ZAIDAN, Ú. R. et al. Environment and variety influence on coffee quality of “Matas de Minas”. Coffee Science, 12(2):240-247, 2017.

Downloads

Published

2023-04-17

How to Cite

ALIXANDRE, R. D. .; ALIXANDRE, F. T. .; LIMA, P. A. M. de; FORNAZIER, M. J.; KROHLING, C. A. .; AMARAL, J. F. T. do; GUARÇONI, R. C.; DIAS, R. da S.; VENTURINI, C. de F. .; MACETTE, H. A.; ZANDONADI, C. U.; VIÇOSI, D. B. Physical and sensorial quality of arabica coffee cultivars submitted to two types of post-harvesting processing. Coffee Science - ISSN 1984-3909, [S. l.], v. 18, p. e182081, 2023. DOI: 10.25186/.v18i.2081. Disponível em: https://coffeescience.ufla.br/index.php/Coffeescience/article/view/2081. Acesso em: 20 sep. 2024.