Influence of water quality on CO2 degassing and sensory attributes in lampung robusta espresso

Authors

  • Muhammad Haviz Department of Chemical Engineering, Engineering Faculty, Lampung University, Bandar Lampung, Lampung, Indonesia. https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1364-633X
  • MIftahul Djana Department of Environmental Engineering, Engineering Faculty, Lampung University, Bandar Lampung, Lampung, Indonesia. https://orcid.org/0009-0008-4822-3170
  • Ni Putu Ariessa Nandini Sann Energi. Jakarta Selatan, Jakarta Indonesia. https://orcid.org/0009-0007-4164-3757
  • Amandha Putri Eltri Department of Chemical Engineering, Engineering Faculty, Lampung University, Bandar Lampung, Lampung, Indonesia. https://orcid.org/0009-0004-0763-1742
  • Nadila Aura Fahrani Department of Chemical Engineering, Engineering Faculty, Lampung University, Bandar Lampung, Lampung, Indonesia. https://orcid.org/0009-0006-3881-5442
  • Oktaf RIna Department of Food Technology, Lampung State Polytechnic, Bandar Lampung Lampung, Indonesia. https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7479-4198

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25186/.v19i.2209

Abstract

Water quality plays a crucial role in shaping the sensory attributes and overall taste experience of Espresso Coffee (EC). This study aimed to investigate the influence of water quality parameters, specifically acidity (pH) and total dissolved solids (TDS), on CO2 degassing kinetics and sensory characteristics in Lampung Robusta espresso. Five different brands of bottled water were utilized for EC extraction, and their impact on CO2 degassing behavior, pH, TDS, and sensory attributes was evaluated. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey’s Honest Significant Difference (HSD) post-hoc tests were employed to assess the significance of differences in CO2 degassing levels among water brands. Two-way ANOVA was used to examine variations in pH and TDS before and after espresso extraction. Sensory evaluation by trained panelists was conducted to assess sensory characteristics. ANOVA revealed significant differences in CO2 degassing levels among water brands (F= 41.21, p= 1.41E-16), with specific brand pairs exhibiting significant variations identified by Tukey’s HSD test. Brand D water maintained the lowest average CO2 emissions (865 ppm) compared to other brands, indicating its potential in stabilizing the release of CO2 during the EC extraction. Two-way ANOVA demonstrated significant differences in pH (F= 38380.37, p < 0.001) and TDS (F= 1178385, p < 0.001) among water brands before and after espresso extraction. The highest TDS elevation observed in brand A post-extraction (7258 ppm) suggests a potential for over-extraction. The lowest final pH in EC was recorded with brand B (5.11) and the highest final pH of brand A (5.32) Sensory evaluation revealed variations
in aroma, acidity, bitterness, body, crema, sweetness, mouthfeel, and flavor notes among espresso samples prepared with different water brands.
This study highlights the significant impact of water quality on CO2 degassing and sensory attributes in Lampung Robusta espresso.

Key words: Espresso; acidity; CO2 degassing; Lampung robusta; sensory analysis.

References

ALFERNANDO, O. et al. Thermal cracking of polyethylene terepthalate (PET) plastic waste. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1567:022023, 2020.

ANALIANASARI, et al. Identification of post-harvest, quality defects, and chemical characteristics (caffeine, chlorogenic acids) of west lampung robusta coffee beans (Case Study of Gapoktan in West Lampung. Jurnal Teknologi & Industri Hasil Pertanian, 27(1):42-52, 2022.

ANGELONI, S. et al. Characterization of the aroma profile and main key odorants of espresso coffee. Molecules, 26(13):3856, 2021.

ANGELONI, G. et al. Physical and chemical effects of different working gases in coffee brewing: a case study of caffè firenze. Foods, 9(12):1825, 2020.

BAGGENSTOSS, J. et al. Influence of water quench cooling on degassing and aroma stability of roasted coffee. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 55(16):6685-6691, 2007.

BATALI, M. E. et al. Sensory and monosaccharide analysis of drip brew coffee fractions versus brewing time. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 100(7):2953-2962, 2020.

BARRERA-LÓPEZ, J. et al. Evaluation of roasting and storage conditions as a strategy to improve the sensory characteristics and shelf life of coffee. Food Science and Technology International, 30(3):207-217, 2024.

BRAGA, M. L. et al. Sensory characterization of coffee brew with consumer‐based methodology and sensometrics. Journal of Food Processing and Preservation, 46(11):e17076, 2022.

COLONNA-DASHWOOD, M. The coffee dictionary: An az of coffee, from growing & roasting to brewing & tasting. Hachette UK, 2017.

CORDOBA, N. et al. Coffee extraction: A review of parameters and their influence on the physicochemical characteristics and flavour of coffee brews. Trends in Food Science & Technology, 96:45-60, 2020.

DA SILVA PORTELA, C. et al. Effects of brewing conditions and coffee species on the physicochemical characteristics, preference and dynamics of sensory attributes perception in cold brews. Food Research International, 151:110860, 2022.

DAVID, W. et al. Characteristics of commercial single-origin organic coffee in Indonesia. Food Science and Technology, 43:e118522, 2023.

DE CARVALHO, P. F. et al. Near-infrared spectroscopy and multivariate calibration as an alternative to the Agtron to predict roasting degrees in coffee beans and ground coffees. Food Chemistry, 365:130471, 2021.

DEROSSI, A. et al. How grinding level and brewing method (Espresso, American, Turkish) could affect the antioxidant activity and bioactive compounds in a coffee cup. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 98(8):3198-3207, 2018.

ELTRI, A. P. et al. Pengaruh waktu blooming dan massa air terhadap ph, tds, dan ec pada kopi robusta liwa lampung dengan metode aeropress. Jurnal Teknologi dan Inovasi Industri, 3(1):16-22, 2022.

FEBRIANTO, N. A.; ZHU, F. Coffee bean processing: Emerging methods and their effects on chemical, biological and sensory properties. Food Chemistry, 412:135489, 2023.

FROST, S. C.; RISTENPART, W. D.; GUINARD, J. Effects of brew strength, brew yield, and roast on the sensory quality of drip brewed coffee. Journal of Food Science, 85(8):2530-2543, 2020.

HASNI, D. et al. Physiochemical properties and cupping quality of gayo espresso coffee based on blending ratio and roasting techniques. International Journal on Advanced Science, Engineering & Information Technology, 13(4):1378-1386, 2023.

HAVIZ, M. et al. The effect of incubation time and drainage PH on the immobilization of copper in post coal mine soil using sumatera brown coal char. Applied Environmental Research, 45(4): 2023.

ILLY, E.; NAVARINI, L. Neglected food bubbles: the espresso coffee foam. Food Biophysics, 6(3):335-348, 2011.

ISHWARYA, S. P.; NISHA, P. Unraveling the science of coffee foam-a comprehensive review. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition, 61(10):1704-1724, 2021.

INDONESIAN GOVERNMENT STANDARD. Water test sampling method for physical and chemical testing, SNI 8995, 2017.

KHAMITOVA, G. et al. Optimization of espresso coffee extraction through variation of particle sizes, perforated disk height and filter basket aimed at lowering the amount of ground coffee used. Food Chemistry, 314:126220, 2020.

KURNIASARI, I. et al. The physical properties of arabica and robusta coffee beans from temanggung and lampung. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 1246:012056, 2023.

LIANG, J.; CHAN, K. C.; RISTENPART, W. D. An equilibrium desorption model for the strength and extraction yield of full immersion brewed coffee. Scientific reports, 11(1):6904, 2021.

LUDWIG, I. A. et al. Extraction of coffee antioxidants: Impact of brewing time and method. Food Research International, 48(1):57-64, 2012.

MANZOCCO, L.; NICOLI, M. C. Modeling the effect of water activity and storage temperature on chemical stability of coffee brews. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 55(16):6521-6526, 2007.

MASELLA, P. et al. A new espresso brewing method. Journal of Food Engineering, 146:204-208, 2015.

MUKHERJEE, A. et al. Carbon dioxide capture from flue gas in biochar produced from spent coffee grounds: Effect of surface chemistry and porous structure. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering, 9(5):106049, 2021.

NAVARINI, L.; RIVETTI, D. Water quality for espresso coffee. Food Chemistry, 122(2):424-428, 2010.

POLTRONIERI, P.; ROSSI, F. Challenges in specialty coffee processing and quality assurance. Challenges, 7(2):19, 2016.

RAMADHANI, A. F.; NISA, F. C.; YUNIANTA. Differences in chemical characteristics due to different roasting of robusta coffee beans. Coffee Science, 18:e182116, 2023.

RAWITCH, M.; MACPHERSON, G. L.; BROOKFIELD, A. Exploring methods of measuring CO2 degassing in headwater streams. Sustainable Water Resources Management, 5:1765-1779, 2019.

RENALDO, N. et al. Improving accounting students' statistical understanding of 2-way anova through a case study of indonesian coffee exports. Reflection: Education and Pedagogical Insights, 1(1):13-19, 2023.

SALAMANCA, C. A. et al. Extraction of espresso coffee by using gradient of temperature. effect on physicochemical and sensorial characteristics of espresso. Food Chemistry, 214:622-630, 2017.

SCHMIEDER, B. K. L. et al. Influence of flow rate, particle size, and temperature on espresso extraction kinetics. Foods, 12(15):2871, 2023.

SEMEDO, J. N. et al. Intrinsic non-stomatal resilience to drought of the photosynthetic apparatus in Coffea spp. is strengthened by elevated air [CO2]. Tree Physiology, 41(5):708-727, 2021.

SILVA, M. Q. M. et al. Carbon dioxide spectrophotometric determination in whole roasted coffee beans using a total analysis system after super-modified simplex optimization. Journal of Food Composition and Analysis, 115:104978, 2023.

SMRKE, S.; EIERMANN, A.; YERETZIAN, C. The role of fines in espresso extraction dynamics. Scientific Reports, 14(1):5612, 2024.

TARIGAN, E. B, et al. The changes in chemical properties of coffee during roasting: A review. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 974:012115, 2022.

VÁRADY, M. et al. Effects of total dissolved solids, extraction yield, grinding, and method of preparation on antioxidant activity in fermented specialty coffee. Fermentation, 8(8):375, 2022.

WANG, X. Understanding the Formation of CO2 and Its Degassing Behaviours in Coffee. Ph.D thesis, University of Guelph. 2014.

WANG, X.; LIM, L.T. Effect of roasting conditions on carbon dioxide degassing behavior in coffee. Food Research International, 61:144-151, 2014.

WANG, X. et al. Investigation of the factors that affect the volume and stability of espresso crema. Food research international, 116:668-675, 2019.

WELLINGER, M.; SMRKE, S.; YERETZIAN, C. The SCAE water chart measure aim treat. Zurich University of Applied Sciences: Winterthur, Switzerland, 2016.

WELLINGER, M.; SMRKE, S.; YERETZIAN, C. Water for extraction-composition, recommendations, and treatment. In: FOLMER, B. (Ed). The craft and science of coffee. Academic Press, p. 381-398. 2016.

WILLIAMS, S. D. et al. Does coffee have terroir and how should it be assessed? Foods, 11(13):1907, 2022.

YEAGER, S. E. et al. Roast level and brew temperature significantly affect the color of brewed coffee. Journal of food science, 87(4):1837-1850, 2022.

ZHANG, Q. et al. Pyrolysis behavior of a green and clean reductant for suspension magnetization roasting. Journal of cleaner production, 268:122173, 2020.

ZISKA, L. H. et al. Climate change, carbon dioxide, and pest biology, managing the future: Coffee as a case study. Agronomy, 8(8):1-21, 2018.

Downloads

Published

2024-08-05

How to Cite

HAVIZ, M.; DJANA, M.; NANDINI, N. P. A.; ELTRI, A. P.; FAHRANI, N. A.; RINA, O. Influence of water quality on CO2 degassing and sensory attributes in lampung robusta espresso. Coffee Science - ISSN 1984-3909, [S. l.], v. 19, p. e192209, 2024. DOI: 10.25186/.v19i.2209. Disponível em: https://coffeescience.ufla.br/index.php/Coffeescience/article/view/2209. Acesso em: 14 oct. 2024.